WorldCourts: International Case Law Database   International Case Law Database
50,000+ decisions · 50+ institutions
 
     
 
   

27 October 1978

 

Communication No. 22/1977

 
     

human rights committee

  Fifth Session  
  23 October – 3 November 1978  
     
     

o. e.

 

v.

s.

     
     
 

DECISION

 
     
 
 
 
     
     
 
BEFORE: CHAIRMAN: Mr. Andreas v. Mavrommatis (Cyprus)
VICE-CHHAIRMEN: Mr. Luben G. Koulishev (Bulgaria), Mr. Rajsoomer Lallah (Mauritius), Mr. Torkel Opsahl (Norway)
ACTING RAPPORTEUR: Mr. Fernando Mora Rojas (Costa Rica)
MEMBERS: Mr. Mohamed Ben-Fadhel (Tunisia), Mr. Ole Mogens Espersen (Denmark), Sir Vincent Evans (United Kingdom), Mr. Manouchehr Ganji (Iran), Mr. Bernhard Graefrath (German Democratic Republic), Mr. Vladimir Hanga (Romania), Mr. Haissam Kelani (Syrian Arab Republic), Mr. Anatoly Petrovich Movchan (Soviet Union), Mr. Julio Prado Vallejo (Ecuador), Mr. Fulgence Seminega (Rwanda), Mr. Walter Surma Tarnopolsky (Canada), Mr. Christian Tomuschat (Federal Republic of Germany)


Mr. Diego Uribe Vargas (Colombia) was unable to attend the fifth session.

   
PermaLink: http://www.worldcourts.com/hrc/eng/decisions/1978.10.27_OE_v_S.htm
   
Citation: O. E. v. S. Comm. 22/1977, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/OP/1, at 35 (HRC 1978)
Publications: Office of the U.N. High Comm'r for Human Rights, Human Rights Committee: Selected Decisions under the Optional Protocol, Vol. I, at 35, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/OP/1, U.N. Sales No. E.84.XIV.2 (1985)
 
     
 
 
     
 

Author's withdrawal of communication from Human Rights Committee to pursue communication before IACHR

 

Article of Optional Protocol: 5 (2) (a)

 

Taking note of the wish of the author of communication No. 22/1977 concerning V, conveyed to the Committee by his representative in a letter dated 16 October 1978, to withdraw the communication from consideration by the Committee, on the grounds that the same matter has been submitted to and is being examined by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights,

 

The Human Rights Committee therefore decides:

 

1.         That proceedings on this communication be discontinued;

 

2.         That this decision be communicated to the author and to the State party.
 
     

 

 






Home | Terms & Conditions | About

Copyright © 1999- WorldCourts. All rights reserved.