Case No.: IT-95-14/2-A
IN THE APPEALS CHAMBER
Before:
Judge David Hunt, Pre-Appeal Judge
Registrar:
Mr Hans Holthuis
Decision of:
30 October 2002
PROSECUTOR
v.
DARIO KORDIC
MARIO CERKEZ
___________________________________________________________
SCHEDULING ORDER
___________________________________________________________
Counsel for the Prosecutor
Mr Norman Farrell
Counsel for Dario Kordic
Mr Mitko Naumovski
Counsel for Mario Cerkez
Mr Bozidar Kovacic
I, Judge Hunt, Pre-Appeal Judge in this case;
NOTING the letter of the Registrar sent to counsel for Mario Cerkez ("counsel") limiting the number of working hours for which payment may be claimed by counsel to 300 hours;
NOTING counsel’s letter of 3 September requesting the Registrar to reconsider its decision;
NOTING the Registrar’s letter of 14 October 2002 stating that there was no sufficient justification for the extension of the number of counsel hours for the remainder of the appeal;
BEING SEISED of "Appellant Mario Cerkez’s Motion for review of the Registrar’s 14 October 2002 Decision", filed on 28 October 2002 ("Motion"), whereby counsel claims that the allotment does not suffice to cover the work necessary to complete this appeal;
NOTING that the Motion has been filed before the Appeals Chamber;
CONSIDERING that the present Scheduling Order should not be regarded as an acceptance, explicit or implicit, of the Appeals Chamber’s jurisdiction over this matter;
HEREBY ORDER that
Done in English and French, the English version being authoritative.
______________________
David Hunt
Pre-Appeal Judge
Done this 30th of October 2002,
At The Hague,
The Netherlands.
[Seal of the Tribunal]