|
International Case Law Database 50,000+ decisions · 50+ institutions |
||||
IN THE TRIAL CHAMBER
Before: Judge Antonio Cassese, Presiding
Judge Richard May
Judge Florence Ndepele Mwachande Mumba
Registrar: Mrs. Dorothee de Sampayo Garrido-Nijgh
Order of: 13 February 1998
PROSECUTOR
v.
ZORAN KUPRESKIC
MIRJAN KUPRESKIC
VLATKO KUPRESKIC
VLADIMIR SANTIC also known as "VLADO"
DRAGO JOSIPOVIC
DRAGAN PAPIC
___________________________________________________________
SCHEDULING ORDER
___________________________________________________________
The Office of the Prosecutor:
Mr. Mark Harmon
Mr. Terree Bowers
Mr. Michael Blaxill
Counsel for the Accused:
Mr. Ranko Radovic, for Zoran Kupreskic
Ms. Jadranka Slokovic Glumac, for Mirjan Kupreskic
Mr. Borislav Krajina and Mr Zelimir Par, for Vlatko Kupreskic
Mr. Petar Pavkovic, for Vladimir Santic
Mr. Luko Susak, for Drago Josipovic
Mr. Petar Puliselic, for Dragan Papic
THE TRIAL CHAMBER, proprio motu,
NOTING the Prosecutors Motion For Leave To Amend the Indictment filed on 9 February 1998 ("the Motion"), pursuant to Rule 50 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence of the International Tribunal ("Rules"),
NOTING that the Office of the Prosecutor ("Prosecution") has stated in the Motion that the Prosecution does not intend to provide the supporting materials for the additional counts in respect of which leave to amend is sought to the Defence unless and until the amendment is granted,
NOTING that the Defence has until Monday 23 February 1998 to file its response to the Motion,
CONSIDERING that it is essential for the Defence to review those materials in order to be able to respond fully to the Motion,
CONSIDERING also that, in another case, the supporting material accompanying an application for leave to amend an indictment pursuant to Rule 50 has been supplied to the Defence without objection,
NOTING FURTHER that the Prosecution seeks to withdraw certain of the charges contained in the original indictment confirmed by Judge McDonald on 11 November 1995,
CONSIDERING that, in order to determine the Motion, it is necessary for the Trial Chamber to examine the supporting materials presented to the confirming Judge, so as to understand and be fully informed as to the reasons why the Prosecution wishes to withdraw these charges, such materials having already been provided to the Defence,
PURSUANT to Rule 54 of the Rules
HEREBY ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:
Done in English and French, the English text being authoritative.
_________________________
Antonio Cassese
Presiding Judge
Dated this thirteenth day of February 1998
At The Hague
The Netherlands
[Seal of the Tribunal]
Follow on X | Database Scope | Terms & Conditions | About
Copyright © 1999- WorldCourts. All rights reserved.