A v. S Comm. 1/1976, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/OP/1, at 35 (HRC 1979)

			International Case Law Database 50,000+ decisions · 50+ institutions

	Follow @worldcourts

24 October 1979

Communication No. 1/1976

human rights committee

Eighth Session

15-26 October 1979

DECISION

BEFORE:	MEMBERS: Mr. Nejib Bouziri (Tunisia), Mr. Abdoulaye Dieye (Senegal), Sir Vincent Evans (United Kingdom), Mr. Manouchehr Ganji (Iran), Mr. Bernhard Graefrath (German Democratic Republic), Mr. Vladimir Hanga (Romania), Mr. Dejan Janca (Yugoslavia), Mr. Haissam Kelani (Syrian Arab Republic), Mr. Luben G. Koulishev (Bulgaria), Mr. Rajsoomer Lallah (Mauritius), Mr. Andreas v. Mavrommatis (Cyprus), Mr. Anatoly Petrovich Movchan (Soviet Union), Mr. Torkel Opsahl (Norway), Mr. Julio Prado Vallejo (Ecuador), Mr. Waleed Sadi (Jordan), Mr. Walter Surma Tarnopolsky (Canada), Mr. Christian Tomuschat (Federal Republic of Germany), Mr. Diego Uribe Vargas (Colombia) All the members except Mr. Ganji and Mr. Uribe Vargas, attended the eighth session of the Committee.

PermaLink:	http://www.worldcourts.com/hrc/eng/decisions/1979.10.24_A_v_S.htm

Citation:	A v. S Comm. 1/1976, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/OP/1, at 35 (HRC 1979)
Publications:	Office of the U.N. High Comm'r for Human Rights, Human Rights Committee: Selection Decision under the Optional Protocol, Vol. I, at 35, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/OP/1, U.N. Sales No. E.84.XIV.2 (1985)

AUTHORS' FAILURE TO RESPOND TO COMMITTEE

The Human Rights Committee,

Considering that no reply has been received from the authors of the communication in response to the Committee's request for further information, set out in paragraph 3 of its decision of 26 January 1978,
Recalling its decisions of 19 July 1978 and 18 April 1979 that the Committee would discontinue consideration of the communication in the absence of a reply from the authors,

Considering that repeated reminders addressed to the authors pursuant to the Committee's decisions of 19 July 1978 and 18 April 1979 have been returned by the postal services after unsuccessful delivery,

Therefore decides:

1. That consideration of the communication be suspended;

2. That this decision be transmitted to the State party and, if possible, to the authors of the communication;

3. That an effort be made, at the same time, to transmit to the authors for information the text of the State party's submission of 5 October 1979 under rule 91 of the Committee's provisional rules of procedure.

Home | Terms & Conditions | About